Oregon — Portland city leaders are advancing a controversial proposal that would force a 20% reduction in fuel storage capacity at the Critical Energy Infrastructure (CEI) Hub, the nerve center holding more than 90% of Oregon’s liquid fuel supply, raising fresh questions about the state’s resilience in the face of earthquakes, supply disruptions, and growing energy demands.
The Portland Bureau of Planning and Sustainability’s CEI Hub Policy Project, recommended by the Planning Commission in March 2026, targets the six-mile industrial corridor along the Willamette River in northwest Portland. This vital cluster of terminals operated by companies including Chevron, Kinder Morgan, BP, and Phillips 66 stores roughly 315–370 million gallons of gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, and related products. Under normal conditions, it maintains about a one-week supply for the state.
Draft regulations detailing the drawdown, requiring terminals to reduce in-service fuel storage capacity by approximately 63 million gallons by 2036, were the subject of public information sessions in June 2026, with City Council hearings anticipated later this year. The plan also prohibits new bulk fuel terminals or major expansions while allowing limited flexibility for aviation fuel and seismic upgrades.
Officials cite urgent safety concerns. The hub sits on unstable, liquefaction-prone soils near the river, making it highly vulnerable to a Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquake. Studies warn of potential massive fuel releases, up to 193 million gallons in a worst-case scenario, which could trigger catastrophic environmental damage, fires, and prolonged supply shortages crippling emergency response.
Portland planners argue the reduction aligns with declining long-term liquid fuel demand forecasts driven by electrification and climate goals, while syncing with state-mandated seismic retrofits overseen by the Department of Environmental Quality.
Yet industry stakeholders warn the move could undermine Oregon’s energy security. The Western States Petroleum Association has cautioned that tank space serves as a critical buffer during disruptions, not excess capacity. Reducing it, they argue, risks tighter supplies, higher costs for consumers and businesses, and complications for blending renewable fuels.
Oregon lacks in-state refining capacity and relies heavily on the Olympic Pipeline from Washington. Recent pipeline incidents have already highlighted the fragility of this just-in-time system. Shrinking storage buffers in a state prone to natural disasters could amplify vulnerabilities rather than resolve them, potentially burdening families and industries with price spikes and shortages when reliability matters most.
As public comment periods continue and City Council prepares to weigh in, the debate underscores a broader tension: balancing legitimate seismic and environmental risks against the need for a robust, reliable fuel supply in an uncertain world. Oregonians reliant on everything from daily commutes to emergency services and freight transport have a stake in the outcome.
About the Author
Discover more from Right Now Oregon
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
