Most Oregonians never knew it, but for decades one of this state’s greatest strategic assets was not timber, not salmon, and not scenic beauty. It was electricity.
Cheap, abundant, reliable hydroelectric power turned the Pacific Northwest into an industrial and national-security engine. It fueled innovation that mattered long before anyone was arguing about data centers or artificial intelligence.
That advantage is now being deliberately weakened, not because of hard engineering limits, but because modern policy increasingly prioritizes emotional narratives over physical reality. The result will be higher power prices, lost economic opportunity, and a grid that may not be capable of supporting either an electrified transportation future or the AI-driven economy already taking shape elsewhere.
How Hydropower Built Real Industry in Oregon
The Columbia River hydro system was never built as a feel-good environmental project. It was built as industrial infrastructure.
Beginning in the 1930s, massive federal investments created dams, transmission lines, and the Bonneville Power Administration to electrify rural communities and provide low-cost, high-volume electricity to American industry during World War II and beyond. The history of that system is documented by BPA itself at https://www.bpa.gov/about/who-we-are/our-history.
That power surplus was intentional. It was meant to be used.
Albany, Oregon became one of the clearest examples of what cheap electricity makes possible.
Albany, Oregon and the Metals That Won the Cold War
In 1943, Congress established what became the Albany Research Center of the U.S. Bureau of Mines specifically to study how electrical energy could be applied to mineral processing. The center’s mission is outlined here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albany_Research_Center.
This was not theoretical research. It was about melting, refining, and fabricating metals that ordinary industry could not handle.
The Albany facility played a critical role in unlocking industrial-scale production of titanium, zirconium, and hafnium. These metals became foundational to aerospace, nuclear power, and national defense.
Zirconium does not absorb neutrons, making it essential for nuclear reactor fuel cladding. Hafnium absorbs neutrons extremely well, making it ideal for control rods. Separating the two is technically complex, energy-intensive, and essential for nuclear propulsion systems.
Albany became a hub for that work. Private industry grew alongside the federal research center, most notably Wah Chang Corporation, which supplied strategic metals for nuclear submarines and aerospace systems. The company’s history is summarized here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wah_Chang_Corporation.
This story is documented in the Albany-authored book Science, Submarines & Secrets, which chronicles how a small Oregon city became central to Cold War metallurgy and national security. The author’s website can be found at https://taistith.wordpress.com/.
This entire ecosystem existed for one reason: electricity was abundant, reliable, and cheap enough to turn electrons into atoms.
When Power Stopped Being Predictable
The Pacific Northwest’s industrial advantage did not disappear overnight. It eroded when electricity stopped being predictable.
The warning shot came during the 2000–2001 West Coast energy crisis. Wholesale power prices spiked, volatility increased, and aluminum smelters across Oregon and Washington shut down. Many never reopened.
Aluminum did not become obsolete. Power economics did.
Once electricity prices became unstable, energy-intensive industries simply could not operate. Oregon quietly transitioned away from industries that convert electricity directly into high-value products.
That lesson should have stuck.
Instead, we are repeating it.
Hydropower Is Now a Policy Target
Today, hydropower itself is increasingly treated as suspect.
Dam removal on the Snake River is no longer a fringe idea. It is an active policy discussion, despite repeated acknowledgments that those dams provide firm power, grid stability, and peak capacity that wind and solar do not replace one-for-one. The Northwest Power and Conservation Council summarizes this debate here: https://www.nwcouncil.org/reports/lower-snake-river-dams.
Even more striking, hydropower in the Willamette Basin is now being formally studied for potential shutdown or removal due to environmental concerns. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has acknowledged these studies under congressional direction, as described here: https://www.nwp.usace.army.mil/Missions/Environment/Willamette-Valley/.
What was once unthinkable is now being normalized.
Hydropower is not just energy. It is capacity. It is inertia. It is reliability during winter cold snaps and summer heat waves. Remove it without fully replacing those services and the grid becomes more fragile, not cleaner.
Electricity Prices Are Rising While Reliability Is Shrinking
At the same time hydropower is being constrained, electricity rates across Oregon have climbed sharply.
Households feel it. Small businesses feel it. Utilities feel it.
Yet policy conversations increasingly treat electricity as something that can be wished into existence rather than engineered.
This is happening just as Oregon faces a surge in large-scale power demand.
Data Centers Are the New Power-Intensive Industry
Data centers are the modern equivalent of aluminum smelters. They are large, electricity-intensive loads. The difference is that they anchor global industries like cloud computing, artificial intelligence, and advanced manufacturing rather than raw materials.
Oregon is attractive to data centers for the same reason Albany was attractive to metallurgists eighty years ago: electricity.
Regional planners now warn that electricity demand in the Northwest could double by mid-century, with data centers driving much of that growth.
That demand is real. The only question is whether it lands in Oregon or somewhere else.
The Governor’s Data Center Committee Misses the Mark
On January 20, 2026, the Oregon Capital Chronicle reported that Governor Tina Kotek formed a new Data Center Advisory Committee to advise on massive data center growth across the state.
The stated goals include balancing economic growth with affordability and environmental protection.
But the committee’s composition tells a different story.
The membership of Governor Tina Kotek’s Data Center Advisory Committee raises a concern. The panel is heavily weighted toward climate and policy perspectives, with members such as Oregon Business for Climate director Tim Miller and former Oregon Environmental Council president Jean Wilson playing prominent roles. While the committee also includes experienced policy hands like Northwest Power and Conservation Council member Margaret Hoffmann and academic voices from the energy-law world, it notably lacks representation from data center operators, grid reliability engineers, transmission planners, or utility professionals directly responsible for serving large industrial loads. The result is a group rich in climate advocacy and policy theory, but comparatively light on the technical and operational expertise needed to grapple with the real physics, costs, and reliability challenges of powering large-scale data infrastructure.
The people who understand the physics, economics, and operational realities of large-scale electrical demand are not in the room.
This looks less like balanced oversight, and more like policy by abstraction.
The Risk Oregon Is Choosing
Oregon’s current trajectory risks achieving all the wrong outcomes at once.
Higher electricity prices for residents and small businesses.
Industrial and technology investment flowing to states with more realistic energy policy.
A grid increasingly dependent on imports and emergency measures during peak events.
Insufficient firm power to support electric vehicles, heat pumps, and the AI economy policymakers claim to support.
All while congratulating ourselves for moral clarity.
Hydropower once made Oregon indispensable to national security and advanced manufacturing. That history is not nostalgia. It is proof that energy policy grounded in engineering reality creates prosperity and resilience.
You can care about fish, climate, and communities without pretending electrons are optional.
Right now, Oregon is in danger of trading one of its greatest strategic advantages for a comforting story that will not keep the lights on.
That’s my viewpoint. Leave your suggestions for Oregon’s power future in the comments.
More Reading / Do Your Own Research
Bonneville Power Administration history
https://www.bpa.gov/about/who-we-are/our-history
Albany Research Center background
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albany_Research_Center
Wah Chang Corporation history
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wah_Chang_Corporation
Science, Submarines & Secrets (author site)
https://taistith.wordpress.com/
Lower Snake River dam policy studies
https://www.nwcouncil.org/reports/lower-snake-river-dams
Willamette Basin hydropower studies
https://www.nwp.usace.army.mil/Missions/Environment/Willamette-Valley/
Governor Kotek’s data center advisory committee
https://oregoncapitalchronicle.com/2026/01/20/oregon-governor-forms-new-committee-to-advise-on-massive-data-center-growth/
About the Author
